Man City Ownership in Focus as Regulator Explains Forced Sale Powers

Manchester City’s ownership has returned to the spotlight after David Kogan confirmed that England’s Independent Football Regulator can compel unsuitable owners to sell. His comments establish the potential reach of football’s new watchdog, but stop well short of announcing action against Sheikh Mansour or his club.

The regulator’s chairman wants City’s appeal against September’s financial-rule findings resolved before deciding whether to launch a separate investigation. For South African supporters following the Premier League title race, the distinction matters: City face unresolved disciplinary proceedings while their team continue to set the pace on the pitch.

Kogan explains the power behind the warning

Since our report on City’s financial verdict, attention has centred on possible sporting penalties. Kogan’s intervention raises another question: whether the conduct of those controlling a club could make them unsuitable to remain in charge.

Speaking on The Rest Is Football with Gary Lineker and Alastair Campbell, Kogan said the regulator could require an owner to step away if they failed its standards. Asked whether an owner could refuse, he replied: “No, no, no. We’ve got absolute power to do so.”

But in his explanation of the City situation, reported by Reuters, Kogan said the regulator would wait for the existing proceedings before deciding whether to investigate. He described prejudging that decision as “a colossal mistake”. No City ownership investigation or divestment order has been publicly announced.

A sale would require a separate legal process

The Premier League investigates breaches of its competition rules, with independent commissions and appeal boards deciding disciplinary cases. The regulator has a separate statutory role overseeing financial sustainability and the suitability of owners and senior club officials.

Its ownership regime includes tests of honesty, integrity and financial soundness. A finding against a club cannot simply be substituted for an assessment of an individual’s suitability: the regulator must examine the relevant conduct under its own framework.

“Absolute power” therefore describes the ability to compel compliance, rather than an unrestricted right to order a sale. Before an ownership removal order, the Football Governance Act’s procedural safeguards require notice, reasons and at least 14 days for representations, which must be considered. Decisions are also subject to statutory review and appeal routes.

What the commission found and City are challenging

The case began with charges brought in February 2023, widely labelled the “115 charges”. Reuters now reports 114 breaches upheld. The commission’s published decision uses a different grouping: four broad charges, including sub-charges, all proved except cooperation Charge 4(B). These are different ways of counting the case.

The findings published by the Premier League on 29 September concern financial reporting across 2009/10 to 2017/18. The commission found that disguised owner funding passed through commercial arrangements, revenues were overstated and costs understated, distorting the accounts by more than £900 million. It also found breaches of spending limits and cooperation duties.

City deny wrongdoing. In their statement confirming the appeal, lodged on 1 October, they argued that the decision contained material errors of law, principle and fact, and maintained that their evidence established innocence. Those are City’s grounds for challenging findings already made by the commission.

The Premier League confirmed the appeal on 2 October; its hearing is private until publication is permitted. No appeal outcome or sanction has been published. If the findings survive, punishment remains a separate decision, with fines, points deductions and other sporting sanctions available. None follows automatically from Kogan’s interview.

Ownership uncertainty meets a winning campaign

Our earlier coverage of City’s appeal and separate tax scrutiny traced the widening financial questions. The ownership issue reaches further into the club’s future: recruitment commitments, infrastructure spending and commercial relationships all depend on dependable long-term stewardship.

Sheikh Mansour’s ownership since 2008 has transformed City. His Newton Investment and Development company holds the majority of parent City Football Group. In June, chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak said Mansour intended to keep developing the club and had no intention of selling.

Meanwhile, Enzo Maresca’s side lead the league with 21 points from seven wins in seven matches, three ahead of Arsenal. Their recent results include a 3–0 win at Liverpool, a 3–2 victory over Ipswich and Tuesday’s 5–1 Champions League success against AEK Athens.

For rival clubs, the issue is whether financial rules can be enforced consistently when the consequences are substantial. City’s appeal will test the commission’s findings; any subsequent ownership assessment would test the regulator’s ability to apply its own standards fairly. Both processes matter to confidence in the competition.

The Betting Read

City’s perfect league start is established evidence for assessing their football prospects. An assumed points deduction is not. Title selections should weigh performances, squad availability and price, while treating unresolved proceedings as uncertainty rather than assigning an invented punishment to the table.

Our sports betting guide helps readers compare markets and understand the bet they are placing. A confirmed appeal outcome or sanction could materially change an outright assessment. Until then, Kogan’s comments provide no sound basis for a bet on a forced sale or a speculative regulatory outcome.

Welcome bonus

10% Sport Free Bet Up To R1,000

18+. New Players Only. T&Cs apply.

Claim now ↗

Affiliate disclosure: StraightBet may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. This does not affect our editorial independence. 18+ only. Bet responsibly. Winners know when to stop. Get help and support.

18+ only. Betting carries risk, so keep it within your means. This guide is written for South African residents and refers to operators licensed by provincial gambling boards under the National Gambling Act. If gambling is taking a toll on you or someone you know, the National Responsible Gambling Programme helpline is free and open 24/7 on 0800 006 008, or text HELP to 076 675 0710. Winners know when to stop.