Rassie Erasmus Fires Back at Dave Rennie Over Springbok Scrum Claims

The Springboks and All Blacks might be level at 1-1, but the pushing has already started ahead of Saturday’s third Test. But this time, it isn’t happening between two packs of forwards.

Rassie Erasmus has hit back at Dave Rennie after the All Blacks coach questioned South Africa’s scrum technique following the Boks’ 33-26 victory in Cape Town.

Rennie believes the Springboks are moving sideways before driving through New Zealand’s tighthead side. Erasmus rejects that completely. More importantly, he believes repeatedly raising the issue in public could influence how officials view the scrum when the teams meet again at FNB Stadium.

What started as a technical disagreement has now become a battle over the story surrounding one of South Africa’s biggest weapons.

What Did Dave Rennie Say About the Springbok Scrum?

The scrum had already become a major talking point before the second Test kicked off. South Africa won six scrum penalties during the opening match at Ellis Park, even though New Zealand recovered elsewhere to claim a 33-16 victory. That set-piece pressure placed the All Blacks’ front row under scrutiny heading into Cape Town.

After the second Test, Rennie said referee Angus Gardner had managed the spacing between the two packs more closely. He felt that produced a more stable contest and allowed both teams to use the ball from the scrum.

However, the New Zealand coach maintained that South Africa’s movement remained an issue. He claimed the Boks could “walk around and go straight through our tighthead” and indicated that New Zealand would provide further technical feedback through the appropriate channels.

Rennie didn’t suggest that every Springbok scrum was illegal, and he acknowledged that the set piece functioned better in Cape Town. His argument was that a particular movement was still giving South Africa an unfair angle of attack.

Erasmus heard something far more serious: a public accusation that the Boks’ scrum dominance comes from illegal technique.

Erasmus Rejects the “Walking Around” Claim

Erasmus’s reaction after the match wasn’t subtle. The Bok coach pointed to South Africa’s long-established scrummaging system and questioned why accusations of walking around had suddenly appeared during this series. He also highlighted the number of New Zealand scrums that collapsed or required resets in Cape Town.

In Erasmus’s view, those collapses couldn’t simply be placed at South Africa’s door because they happened repeatedly on New Zealand’s feed.

He insisted that the Springboks drive through their opponents rather than moving around them, saying plainly: “We scrum straight.”

Erasmus also accused Rennie of creating a narrative through the media. His concern was that once a particular allegation gains enough attention, officials, pundits and supporters begin watching every scrum through that lens.

A loosehead prop stepping slightly to the side becomes proof. A collapse becomes proof. Even a clean forward drive can look suspicious once everyone’s been told what they’re supposed to find. And that is where a technical disagreement becomes something much bigger.

Rassie Returns With a Calmer Explanation

Two days later, Erasmus addressed the issue again while announcing his team for the third Test in Soweto. The language was calmer, but his position hadn’t changed.

Erasmus explained that teams already have formal ways to raise concerns about an opponent’s play. Coaches can submit clips through the relevant analysis system and discuss specific issues during the pre-match meeting with the referee, with both coaching teams represented.

His frustration wasn’t simply that Rennie held a different opinion. It was that the claim had entered the public conversation as though it had already been proven.

As Erasmus put it, a coach “can’t make opinion facts.”

He compared the situation to repeatedly accusing New Zealand of entering breakdowns from the side in the hope that officials would begin looking for it. Erasmus knows the danger better than most after his own previous battles over refereeing and public commentary.

The Bok coach also defended scrum coach Daan Human. He said walking around an opposition pack isn’t how South Africa’s scrum is coached and wouldn’t suit the direct power the Boks try to generate.

Strip away the anger and that is the centre of Erasmus’s argument: use the review process, provide the clips and let the officials decide.

What Actually Happened in the Cape Town Scrums?

The inconvenient truth for anyone looking for a simple answer is that Cape Town didn’t completely prove either coach right.

South Africa’s scrum was far less influential than it had been at Ellis Park. The Boks earned only one scrum penalty during the second Test after collecting six in the series opener.

There were also several resets, including a long sequence during the first half that slowed the match without producing a clear sanction against either team.

That could support Rennie’s view that closer refereeing of the setup prevented South Africa from gaining the same advantage. It could also support Erasmus’s complaint that New Zealand found ways to neutralise the contest without being penalised.

Scrum decisions are rarely as clean as supporters want them to be. Eight bodies are pushing from each side, the angles can change within seconds and the referee often has an imperfect view of what caused the collapse.

The scoreboard doesn’t settle the argument either. South Africa won the match, but the scrum wasn’t the penalty-producing machine it had been at Ellis Park.

Why the Soweto Front Row Matters

Erasmus has added another layer to the argument with his selection for Saturday.

Ox Nche, Malcolm Marx and Wilco Louw have all been restored to the starting front row after beginning the Cape Town Test among the replacements.

They were initially selected to start last weekend before Erasmus made a late switch, promoting Gerhard Steenekamp, Deon Fourie and Thomas du Toit. He later explained that the dry, firm surface influenced the decision to start with the lighter combination. Nche, Marx and Louw are now back in the run-on side for FNB Stadium.

That doesn’t guarantee South African dominance, but it ensures that every early scrum will be inspected like evidence at a crime scene. If the Boks drive New Zealand backwards, the angle of the push will be studied.

If the scrum wheels, everyone will argue over who caused it. If the referee repeatedly resets the contest, neither coach will be particularly satisfied. The front-row contest was always going to matter. After this week’s exchange, it’s become one of the defining stories of the third Test.

When Is Springboks vs All Blacks Test 3?

South Africa face New Zealand at FNB Stadium in Johannesburg on Saturday the 5th of September 2026, with kick-off scheduled for 17:10 SAST.

The four-match series is tied at one victory each after New Zealand won 33-16 at Ellis Park and South Africa responded with a 33-26 victory in Cape Town.

After the Soweto Test, both teams travel to Baltimore for the fourth and final meeting on 12 September.

The Betting Read

The restored Springbok front row makes the scrum an obvious part of any pre-match analysis, but it would be a mistake to treat power up front as an automatic source of penalties.

South Africa dominated the Ellis Park scrum without winning the match. A week later, the Boks earned far less from the set piece and still won 33-26. That alone should kill the lazy assumption that the scrum tells us everything about the final result.

Refereeing interpretation matters too. One official might reward forward movement quickly, while another could order repeated resets if the picture isn’t clear. New Zealand also have a full week to review the Cape Town footage and prepare for Nche, Marx and Louw.

That makes the match handicap more complicated than simply backing South Africa because their heavyweight front row has returned. If the Boks establish an early set-piece advantage, it could give them better field position and more opportunities to apply pressure. If New Zealand hold firm or prevent clean penalty decisions, South Africa may need to find their edge elsewhere.

The points total deserves the same caution. The first two Tests produced 49 and 59 points respectively, but Soweto doesn’t have to follow that pattern. With the series tied and both teams aware of how damaging mistakes have been, territory and game management could become more important if the match remains close.

We’d check the final conditions, referee appointment and available lines before making any decision. Most importantly, we wouldn’t turn a press-conference argument into evidence that South Africa are guaranteed to dominate the scrum.

If you’re still learning how set pieces, handicaps and totals affect rugby markets, our Test rugby betting guide breaks down the basics without burying everything beneath rugby jargon.

Rennie believes he has identified an illegal angle. Erasmus believes New Zealand are trying to create one in the minds of the officials. On Saturday, the talking stops and sixteen forwards get to provide the only answer that really matters.

Welcome Bonus

200% up to R2,000

New customers only. T&Cs apply.

CLAIM NOW ↗

Affiliate disclosure: StraightBet may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. This does not affect our editorial independence. 18+ only. Bet responsibly. Winners know when to stop. Get help and support.

18+ only. Betting carries risk, so keep it within your means. This guide is written for South African residents and refers to operators licensed by provincial gambling boards under the National Gambling Act. If gambling is taking a toll on you or someone you know, the National Responsible Gambling Programme helpline is free and open 24/7 on 0800 006 008, or text HELP to 076 675 0710. Winners know when to stop.