Nortje Ruled Out of Newlands Decider as Proteas Face Selection Call

Anrich Nortje has been ruled out of South Africa’s deciding Test against Australia at Newlands, with Cricket South Africa confirming his withdrawal on Saturday, 24 October. A mild groin injury sustained in Gqeberha has ended the fast bowler’s series before Tuesday’s finale.

The series is level at 1–1, and the Proteas now have to decide what kind of bowler they need in his place. Gerald Coetzee, Corbin Bosch and Dane Paterson remain available in an otherwise unchanged squad. None has been confirmed in the starting XI.

Nortje’s short spell leaves a vacancy

South Africa’s series-levelling win in Gqeberha was completed with Nortje unable to contribute beyond his opening spell. He delivered just 3.3 overs in Australia’s first innings before leaving the field on the fourth morning, Wednesday, 21 October, and took no further part.

CSA’s announcement describes the injury as mild. IANS reports that scans on Thursday confirmed it, but no recovery timeline has been announced. His availability beyond this Test therefore remains uncertain.

There has been no call-up to replace him in the squad. The choice comes from players already with the group, allowing the selectors to change the attack’s emphasis without bringing in someone new for a series decider.

Pace, control or more batting depth?

Coetzee offers the closest replacement for Nortje’s pace. Selecting him would preserve a fast, attacking option alongside Kagiso Rabada and Marco Jansen, with Wiaan Mulder providing another seam route. It would also keep a distinct role for a bowler used to unsettle batters rather than simply extend the other quicks’ spells.

Paterson presents a different case. His control and ability to sustain a probing line would give the captain another way to build pressure. Choosing him would suggest South Africa value that consistency more than trying to reproduce Nortje’s speed.

Bosch brings fast bowling and extra batting depth. That combination could appeal after South Africa needed Temba Bavuma’s 179 to rescue their second-Test innings, although a longer batting order must still leave enough bowling to take 20 wickets.

These are choices about the team’s balance. A replacement needn’t copy Nortje to make the attack effective, but his job must fit those around him.

Keshav Maharaj is another option after sitting out in Gqeberha, where Simon Harmer was the lone spinner. Senuran Muthusamy is also in the squad. A second spinner would change the workload shared by the seamers; that decision needs the actual Newlands surface, rather than a prediction based on the venue’s reputation.

The remaining attack has already delivered

Nortje’s absence removes pace and reduces Bavuma’s options, but Gqeberha showed why it shouldn’t be treated as the loss of South Africa’s only attacking weapon.

Jansen’s first-innings 5/33 helped dismiss Australia for 99. Rabada then took 4/77 and Mulder 3/64 in the second innings as the tourists were bowled out for 295. South Africa’s 425/9 declared was enough for victory by an innings and 31 runs.

Those contributions matter more to the selection debate than the winning margin alone. Rabada, Jansen and Mulder supplied wicket-taking routes while Nortje was unavailable. Giving them suitable support in Cape Town is the immediate task, especially if Australia bat for longer and force Bavuma to manage extended spells.

What remains open before Tuesday

Cricket Australia’s match information lists the decider for 27–31 October, with the first ball scheduled for 10:30 SAST on Tuesday. The squad announcement confirms who can be considered; it doesn’t settle the XI or the seam-spin split.

The Betting Read

We wouldn’t make Australia the better bet solely because Nortje is out. South Africa still have an attack that took 20 wickets in Gqeberha despite losing him early. The replacement, the complete XI and the available match-winner price will determine how much weight his absence deserves.

Bowler-wicket markets need a more detailed view. A quick used in short attacking bursts has a different opportunity from one trusted to bowl longer spells. Adding a spinner could redistribute overs again. Selection creates a starting point for that assessment; it doesn’t guarantee a particular workload.

Our cricket betting explainer covers the market choices. When comparing prices, distinguish an innings wicket market from a full-match one and check the settlement terms. A strong bowler can still be poorly priced if the market assumes more overs than his role is likely to provide.

The broader principles in our sports betting overview apply here: compare the same market and judge the price against the evidence. Until the XI and conditions are clearer, Nortje’s withdrawal is a reason to reassess South Africa’s balance, rather than force a bet on either side.

Welcome bonus

Up to R6,000 Welcome Bonus

New customers only. 100% match on each of your first three deposits, up to R6,000 in total. Qualifying deposits and wagering requirements apply. T&Cs apply. 18+.

View offer ↗

Affiliate disclosure: StraightBet may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. This does not affect our editorial independence. 18+ only. Bet responsibly. Winners know when to stop. Get help and support.

18+ only. Betting carries risk, so keep it within your means. This guide is written for South African residents and refers to operators licensed by provincial gambling boards under the National Gambling Act. If gambling is taking a toll on you or someone you know, the National Responsible Gambling Programme helpline is free and open 24/7 on 0800 006 008, or text HELP to 076 675 0710. Winners know when to stop.